Foreword //

We are pleased to jointly present the TYNDP 2026 Scenarios underpinning ENTSO-E’s and ENTSOG’s 2026 Ten-Year Network Development Plans (TYNDP). The joint electricity, gas, and hydrogen scenario and, for the first time ever, the economic variants provide a consistent and forward-looking foundation for planning Europe’s future energy infrastructure in support of the energy transition.
Scenarios are a prerequisite for outlook assessment of the European energy system. Under the TEN-E Regulation (EU) 2022/869 and the ACER TYNDP Scenarios Framework Guidelines, they play a central role in ensuring that infrastructure planning across electricity, methane and hydrogen is aligned, coherent, and based on shared assumptions. The TYNDP 2026 cycle marks the first full implementation of these Guidelines from the outset, strengthening the transparency, comparability, and reliability of the scenario-building process.
Sonya Twohig

Sonya Twohig
Secretary-General ENTSO-E

Piotr Kus

Piotr Kuś
General Director ENTSOG

Within the legal boundaries outlined above, modelling is performed by the technical operators (ENTSO-E and ENTSOG). This ensures robust system analysis and projections based on operational expertise. It ensures a direct link to national planning realities, operational needs and infrastructure delivery, which is essential for credible and implementable grid deployment. ENTSO-E and ENTSOG contribute as trusted advisors and bring well established expertise, hands-on experience, and in-depth knowledge to the process. This insight is essential to create realistic scenarios based on industries and citizens’ needs while enabling political ambitions to meet the energy and climate goals.

The TYNDP 2026 Scenarios Framework introduces a streamlined structure centred on one Central Scenario (National Trends +), complemented by two Economic Variants reflecting high and low economic growth. The Central Scenario reflects the latest national strategies, updated National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs), and EU policy objectives, while the Economic Variants act as stress tests in assessing the resilience of the energy system under different macroeconomic conditions. Together, they provide a credible and policy-aligned basis in determining infrastructure requirements for a secure, interconnected and sustainable future.

The Central Scenario illustrates a profound transformation of Europe’s energy system towards climate neutrality by 2050. It highlights a structural transformation of Europe’s energy landscape with a continued decline in overall energy demand driven by efficiency gains and electrification, alongside strong growth in electricity demand.

Methane demand progressively decreases and becomes a fully decarbonised energy vector over time, while hydrogen emerges as a key energy carrier, particularly in the industry sector and as the major source of flexibility. These trends underline the growing importance of an integrated energy system in which electricity and hydrogen play central roles, supported by decarbonised and renewable gases.

In line with EU requirements, the Central Scenario’s design is consistent with the Union’s 2030 energy and climate targets and the 2050 climate neutrality objective. Where gaps between aggregated national trajectories and EU-level targets were identified, a transparent and harmonised methodology was applied to ensure alignment while preserving national contributions. The results are benchmarked against external European studies, reinforcing their credibility.

The development of the scenario followed a structured and inclusive process, with extensive stakeholder engagement and public consultations. In particular, we express our appreciation to everyone involved in the Stakeholder Reference Group (SRG) who guide us in a structured review on methodologies and datasets, ensuring transparency, broad participation, and effective scrutiny. This collaborative approach contributes directly to the quality and buy-in of the results.

The resulting scenario and its variants form the analytical backbone for the ENTSO-E and ENTSOG TYNDPs, enabling the assessments of infrastructure gaps, identification of investment gaps and the evaluation of project benefits. They provide policymakers, Member States, and stakeholders with a shared and dependable reference to support informed decisions on Europe’s future energy infrastructure. In addition to TYNDP Scenarios, the ENTSO-E European Resource Adequacy Assessment (ERAA) reflects the importance to more deeply analyse risks within a 10-year period. ENTSOG proposes further work to undertake a more thorough investigation of adequacy between supply and demand in the context of the gas grid infrastructure and the ongoing status of the energy transition via the Mid-Term European Gas Adequacy Assessment.

The EU Grids Package includes a proposal to revise of the TEN-E Regulation which is a cornerstone for the TYNDPs used by ENTSO-E, ENTSOG, ENNOH and national TSOs. It is more important than ever to have robust system planning based on TYNDP Scenarios that reflect targets, technical context and are rooted in the reality to deliver infrastructure. ENTSO-E and ENTSOG stand ready to continue their work in next TYNDPs together with stakeholders. Geopolitical context and national policies change rapidly, and correct investment decisions should be made for infrastructure that will have long lasting impact to create resilience and reduce costs.

Our scenario teams remain available for any further information at scenarios@entsos-tyndp-scenarios.eu. We look forward to continuing our cooperation with all stakeholders as we move forward in the TYNDP process.

1 Executive Summary //

The Ten-Year Network Development Plan (TYNDP) 2026 Scenario Package provides a ­transparent and cross-sectoral outlook for the future European energy system. It is jointly developed by the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (­ENTSO‑E) and the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSOG) to underpin the Union‑wide TYNDPs. The scenarios establish a consistent quantitative basis for electricity, gas, and hydrogen infrastructure assessment. The Scenarios ensure that network planning decisions are grounded in policy‑aligned and stakeholder‑informed assumptions.

Scenarios are not meant to forecast the future. They are exploratory tools rather than predictive exercises, illustrating how developments may unfold under different assumptions regarding policy, technology, markets, and societal trends.

Given the uncertainty about those developments and the complexity of the exercise, the TYNDP Scenarios — ranging from the modelling of demand of multiple energy carriers to highly detailed pan-European electricity and hydrogen system representations — necessarily rely on simplifications and assumptions. To support the use and interpretation of the scenarios by industry, academia and the wider stakeholder community, the reports and their appendices give more context on how to interpret the results. Nevertheless, these scenarios constitute one of the most comprehensive and detailed representations of possible developments in European energy demand and supply. Being anchored in National and European policy objectives as well as climate ambitions, they provide the basis for pan European infrastructure planning within the respective Ten-Year Network Development Plans (TYNDP) 2026, and further analytical work. The TYNDP 2026 Scenario Framework comprises one Central Scenario (also called National Trends+ (NT+)), reflecting the latest national strategies, updated National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs), and EU policies.

It is complemented by two Economic Variants which differ in high and low economic growth. These variants function as stress tests of the Central Scenario. They provide insights into the robustness of infrastructure needs under differing macro‑economic conditions. These are in line with the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) “TYNDP Scenarios Guidelines”. Scenario inputs were subject to a policy cut‑off date with extensive validation at national level by TSOs and national authorities.

This cycle marks the first full implementation of ACER’s TYNDP Scenarios Framework Guidelines from the start of the process. The scenario development followed a structured, transparent, and inclusive methodology, covering preparation, objective‑driven design, and comprehensive stakeholder engagement. A fully operational Stakeholder Reference Group (SRG), public consultations and the publication of methodologies and datasets ensured effective scrutiny and accountability throughout the process. The scenario results are benchmarked with relevant external studies, including European Commission (EC) and Joint Research Centre (JRC) scenarios, to enhance comparability and credibility.

Compliance with the EU’s 2030 energy and climate targets and the 2050 climate neutrality objective is a core design feature of the scenario set. Where gaps between aggregated national trajectories and EU‑wide objectives remained, a transparent gap-filling methodology was applied. This approach ensured consistency with Union targets while preserving national input where possible. This highlights the structural gap between current policy trajectories and agreed EU targets, which requires additional adjustments at EU level to ensure consistency with the climate objectives. Achieving such consistency would require further improvements in energy efficiency, accelerated deployment of ­renewable energy sources, and enhanced integration across electricity, gas and hydrogen systems. The achievement of these outcomes therefore depends on the timely implementation of these developments within the assumed time horizons.

The TYNDP 2026 scenarios highlight a structural transformation of Europe’s energy system towards climate neutrality by 2050. Over the long term, final energy demand declines, driven by efficiency gains and the progressive electrification of end-use sectors.

At the same time, electricity demand increases significantly. This growth is driven by electrification in transport, widespread deployment of heat pumps, the transformation of industrial processes, and the expansion of hydrogen production via electrolysis, among other factors. As a form of indirect electrification, electrolysis increasingly relies on renewable electricity and is aligned with periods of high renewable generation, thereby also contributing to system flexibility.

Methane demand steadily decreases and reaches full decarbonisation by 2050 through the use of biomethane and synthetic gases. This decline is more gradual in final consumption sectors, while a faster phase-out is observed in the power generation sector.

Hydrogen emerges as a key energy carrier for hard-to-abate sectors such as parts of industry and transport. Beyond its role in direct applications, hydrogen contributes to system flexibility and serves as a critical input for the production of e-fuels. Over time, hydrogen demand for e-fuel production increases significantly, becoming comparable in scale to direct hydrogen use.

Overall, the scenarios depict a progressive decarbonisation pathway towards an integrated energy system in which electricity and hydrogen play a central role.

Download //

TYNDP 2026 Scenarios Package

Cover Scenarios Package

TYNDP 2026 Draft Scenarios Report

Main report of the scenarios package, explaining the purpose, context and key findings as well as stakeholders’ engagement steps taken. The report also includes a description of the main results and a benchmark against other scenarios.

TYNDP 2026 Scenarios Methodology Report

Describes the methodology applied to build the 2026 scenarios. It includes a description of the overall process, detailed explanations of modelling principles and an overview of modelling parameters.

Annexes to the TYNDP 2026 Draft Scenarios Report

Annotations to the TYNDP 2026 Draft Scenarios Report.

TYNDP 2026 Draft Scenarios Data Figures

TYNDP 2026 Scenarios Methodology Data Tables

Please contact us at: